Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Advantages of Distributed Operating Systems

Advantages of Distributed Operating Systems

There are three important advantages in the design of distributed operating system:

1. Major breakthrough in microprocessor technology: Micro- processors have become very much powerful and cheap, compared with mainframes and minicomputers, so it has become attractive to think about designing large systems consisting of small processors. These distributed systems clearly have a price/performance advantages over more traditional systems.

2. Incremental Growth: The second advantage is that if there is a need of 10 per cent more computing power, one should just add 10 per cent more processors. System architecture is crucial to the type of system growth, however, since it is hard to give each user of a personal computer another 10 per cent.

3. Reliability: Reliability and availability can also be a big advantage; a few parts of the system can be down without disturbing people using the other parts; On the minus side, unless one is very careful, it is easy for the communication protocol overhead to become a major source of inefficiency.

Now let us see how file system, protection and program execution are supported in distributed operating system.

File System: Distributed operating system supports a single global file system visible from all machines. When this method is used, there is one directory for executable programs (in UNIX, it is bin directory), one password file and so on. When a program wants to read the password file it does something like

Open (*/etc/password", READ-ONLY) 

without reference to where the file is. It is upto the operating system to locate the file and arrange for transport of data as they are needed.

The convenience of having a single global name space is obvious. In addition, this approach means that operating system is free to move files around among machines to keep all the disks generally full and busy and that the system can maintain replicated copies of files if it chooses. When the user or program must specify the machine name, the system cannot decide on its own to move a file to a new machine because that would change the (user visible) name used to access the file. Thus in a network operating system, control over file placement must be done manually by the users, whereas in a distributed operating system it can be done automatically by the system itself. 

Protection: In a true distributed system there is a unique UID for every user, and that UID should be valid on all machines without any mapping. In this way no protection problems arise on remote access to files; a remote access can be treated like a local access with the same UID. There is a difference between network operating system and distributed operating system in implementing protection issue. In networking operating system, there are various machines, each with its own user to UID mapping but in distributed operating system there is a single systemwide mapping that is valid everywhere.

Program Execution: In the most distributed case the system chooses a CPU by looking at the processing load of the machine, location of file to be used etc. In the least distributed case, the system always run the process on one specific machine.

An important difference between network and distributed operating system is how they are implemented. A common way to realise a networking operating system is to put a layer of software on top of the native operating system of the individual machines. For example one could write a special library package that could intercept all the system calls and decide whether each one was local or remote. 

No comments:

Post a Comment